Talk:VG Cats
Link to original discussion page
http://badwebcomics.wikidot.com/forum/t-124309/vg-cats
Problems with the article
The article has some severe problems which need to be fixed. Namely, many links don't point to the page they're likely referring to. Furthermore, reviewer seems to possibly be a homophobe?
- The VG site must have made some changes and it fucked shit up. It happens often and we never bother fixing it. As far as the "homophobia", this isn't a PC site. We make black jokes, we make gay jokes and we make would probably make holocaust jokes if we had the right context. My policy is that anyone who's feeling are hurt by this sort of shit can just fuck off.
oddguy 13:35, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
- I'm seriously tired of every asshole on the internet demanding people be sensitive to their feelings. I should make up a fake term (like whoever it was that invented "homophobia" to mean hatred against gay people) for hatred against social conservatives. Then I'll run around demanding all these sensitive assholes stop committing it. I wonder how many of them will have an excuse for their hypocrisy. (No, I don't; it will be all of them.) --SmashLampjaw (talk) 16:40, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Review is biased against abortion
While abortion is undoubtedly a controversial subject, this review seems to take the position that it is universally disgusting and/or morally offensive. This is obviously not the case for all readers, and I find it rather hypocritical that a site whose official stance on oversensitivity is that "anyone who's feeling [sic] are hurt [...] can just fuck off" would condemn a comic for offending their sensibilities with references to/depictions of abortion. As far as I'm concerned, the other points against the comic still stand, but to fault it for treating abortion frivolously while reveling in your own irreverence would be extremely un-self-aware. At least be consistent. -- Skellie10(talk) 19:31, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
