|Original review author:||webkilla in December 2021|
|Forum Discussion Threads:||link|
|Webcomic name:||Lovin' Sis|
|End Date:||Still somehow ongoing|
|Genre:||Underage incest erotica|
|Defining Flaw:||See genre and pass the sipping bleach|
Originally suggested back in 2018, then forgotten, then dug back up by a brave forumite - this horror was instantly put on the chopping block.
Story & Plot
It is at times easy when writing a review in this community to imagine oneself in the mind of a given cartoonist. Is that the cartoonist is just madly desperate for validation for some very questionable life choices, is it that the cartoonist really liked D&D and now really likes neo-pronouns and social justice?, or perhaps the cartoonist is a sex-starved lunatic who thinks he's figured out that secret to utopia is being a depressive dick-girl on mars, or what about just making a webcomic so you can fanwank over your own home-made civilization with a custom language and everything?. Some comics are easy to understand, and through that easy to explain why they are bad. Even sick weird fetish comics can be relatively easy to figure out, even if they leave you woozy from the fumes.
This one... this one is not. Not that there is much to understand, because the plot of this comic can be summed up as "everyone is fucking everyone" - the problem is that this summary clashes rather violently with the art style which mainly reminds this cartoonist of things like old comics like Beetle Bailey. There's be a lot more of that in the art section, but the point is that for what is ostensibly a porn comic with a shoe-string plot of "everyone is an underage nympho" then it just... it doesn't show the porn. It just doesn't have the art style befit for a porn comic.
I'm not even going to bother linking to any of the pages of the comic - mainly because it seems that the cartoonist is having some rather understandable problems finding steady hosting. I mean, what honest webhost would want to host a comic about children fucking the shit out of each other? And we are talking some very underage and very horny little rascals here. Full frontal, everything showing. Gee, I wonder why this shit has a habit of getting taken down.
I mean, look at the main characters:
- Lucy: A preteen girl nymphomaniac who doesn't care about getting consent but has eternal plot armor.
- Chloe: Lucy's high school sister. Has a crush on the school slut but is too socially awkward to talk to her. (Yes, of course they end up fucking...)
- Susan: Single mother to the above two. Finds out about the incest, approves of it, and only barely avoids joining in. She's also a teacher at the local school and has a harem of unrelated schoolgirls.
- Valerie: The school bicycle, doing every girl and guy in the school, including her own brother. (You're introduced to her, as she is sucking off her younger pre-teen brother)
A running gag in season one is Lucy grabbing some preteen boy she has the hots for and basically raping the boy - but because porn comic logic, then it's just "oh those darn kids" and he's sent off thoroughly fucked with a pat on the head.
The writing is not unlike Darren's Adventure, where a self-insert OC plops into Springfield and fucks every female Simpsons character. It's porn writing. It makes absolutely no sense, other than to facilitate that characters get together, get their clothes off, and rub uglies. It doesn't matter if it's sister on sister, teacher on student, or mother on child. It should be noted that there doesn't appear to be any adult men involved in any of it - its children, mainly girls, some adult women (the mother and the schoolteacher), and a young male boy. Well, in "season 2", a male teacher is introduced, who of course fucks all the girls in his class, so that's that.
Then again, for a porn comic, you really can't expect much... except as noted earlier: it doesn't have the art style for a porn comic.
For some strange reason, showing child pornography (even of the cartoon variety) is somewhat frowned upon here on the wiki.
About 95% of the pages feature some kind of nudity, sexual activity, a combination of the two, or some other kind of adult content - character development can be tracked visually by how deep the girls can be fisted here.
But ok, lets see how bad this is:
Now, this art actually looks nice - if it was for a slice of life type drama comic. You're not in doubt about what emotions the characters are supposed to express, its colorful, the shading is decent, the backgrounds are passable. The problem is that it's a porn comic. These cartoony wide-eyed pseudo-stick figure characters are well drawn, but the style does not in any way whatsoever lend itself to pornography. Not really sure what the fuck the cartoonist was thinking. The style doesn't even change that much over time:
Seriously - look at these two comic pages: Look at how stiff the poses are. Look at how angular the arms are. It's the exact same vector graphic models used when they're nude. If you flood-filled them grey you could make a good case that it was skeleton porn, because they look so wooden and stiff. For a porn comic, aren't you supposed to have at least some organic flow to the curves and shapes on display? The sad thing is that making vector art like that requires some level of competence - but holy shit, cranking out several hundred pages of crap like this... talk about waste of talent. With this kind of art style, you'd expect the comic to be about a teenage witch, or a 12-year-old suddenly getting magical fairy powers - this is just not a style conducive to good porn.
No clue who this lunatic is - but I think there's a woodchipper that has its hopper with his/her/its name on it somewhere, because Xierra099 has openly bragged online about being a pedo. Beyond that, Xierra claims to be a woman from Uruguay.
As mentioned earlier, then the writing and plot are bog standard for porn comics. Sure, the theme of underage incest is supremely cringe, but its cartoon porn... the problem is that the art does not in any way support it. There are tons of shitty porn comics reviewed on this wiki, like ClosetCoon or freaky shit like U.S. Angel Corps, even ones that occasionally had some actual story between the porn like Peter is the Wolf, but this comic... it just fails spectacularly as a porn comic, because the art is barely a few steps up from colored stick figures - and if there's one thing that all of the porn comics given as examples here have in common, then it is that they were at least drawn by someone who knew how to draw halfway decent porn.
It is strange. This reviewer has seen a lot of twisted shit - but a porn comic that simply straight up fails to contain good porn? That's a new one. And make no mistake, there are plenty of comics that just feature shitty art as a means to cram in as much cheesecake as possible - but this is on par with Nikki Sprite for strangely wooden porn.
- The Artist's Baraag account - this might end up getting deleted, just like every other place the cartoonist has hosted the comic
- The baraag thread with the whole comic
These three links might have a bit more longevity for hosting the comic